From 5a903b3dca614142434a51054157e1f6642a63ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaron Kent-Dobias Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:49:13 +0100 Subject: Missing word added. --- bezout.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bezout.tex b/bezout.tex index 4b3bd19..902818c 100644 --- a/bezout.tex +++ b/bezout.tex @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ One might balk at the constraint $z^Tz=N$---which could appropriately be called a \emph{hyperbolic} constraint---by comparison with $z^\dagger z=N$. The reasoning behind the choice is twofold. -First, we seek draw conclusions from our model that are applicable to generic +First, we seek to draw conclusions from our model that are applicable to generic holomorphic functions without any symmetry. Samples of $H_0$ nearly provide this, save for a single anomaly: the value of the energy and its gradient at any point $z$ correlate along the $z$ direction, with $\overline{H_0\partial -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2