From d022afbcd73e46a3bdc77e250bc9c6f8aa9af14e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:25:34 +0100
Subject: More wording tweaks.

---
 bezout.tex | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

(limited to 'bezout.tex')

diff --git a/bezout.tex b/bezout.tex
index 151ea2a..2a34bbf 100644
--- a/bezout.tex
+++ b/bezout.tex
@@ -85,12 +85,10 @@ $2N$-dimensional complex space has turned out to be necessary for correctly
 defining and analyzing path integrals with complex action (see
 \cite{Witten_2010_A, Witten_2011_Analytic}), and as a useful palliative for the
 sign problem \cite{Cristoforetti_2012_New, Tanizaki_2017_Gradient,
-Scorzato_2016_The}.  In order to do this correctly, features of landscape of
-the action in complex space---such as the relative position of saddles and the
+Scorzato_2016_The}.  In order to do this correctly, features of the action's landscape in complex space---such as the relative position of saddles and the
 existence of Stokes lines joining them---must be understood.  This is typically
-done for simple actions with few critical points, or for a target
-phenomenology with symmetries that restrict the set of critical
-points to few candidates. Given the recent proliferation of `glassiness' in
+done for simple actions with few saddles, or for a target
+phenomenology with symmetries that restrict the set of saddles to few candidates. Given the recent proliferation of `glassiness' in
 condensed matter and high energy physics, it is inevitable that someone will
 want to apply these methods to a system with a complex landscape, and will find
 they cannot use approaches that rely on such assumptions. Their landscape may not be random: here we
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf

