From d0945d932b815a7eeab00723d4b76d32d037216f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaron Kent-Dobias Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:13:40 +0100 Subject: More small changes. --- bezout.tex | 21 ++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'bezout.tex') diff --git a/bezout.tex b/bezout.tex index 57e48ae..8c24d59 100644 --- a/bezout.tex +++ b/bezout.tex @@ -48,12 +48,10 @@ family of these are the mean-field spherical $p$-spin models \cite{Crisanti_1992_The} (for a review see \cite{Castellani_2005_Spin-glass}) defined by the energy \begin{equation} \label{eq:bare.hamiltonian} - H_0 = \sum_p \frac{c_p}{p!}\sum_{i_1\cdots i_p}^NJ_{i_1\cdots i_p}z_{i_1}\cdots z_{i_p}, + H_0 = \frac1{p!}\sum_{i_1\cdots i_p}^NJ_{i_1\cdots i_p}z_{i_1}\cdots z_{i_p}, \end{equation} where $J$ is a symmetric tensor whose elements are real Gaussian variables and -$z\in\mathbb R^N$ is constrained to the sphere $z^2=N$. If there is a -single term of a given $p$, this is known as the `pure $p$-spin' model, the -case we shall study here. This problem has been studied in the algebra +$z\in\mathbb R^N$ is constrained to the sphere $z^2=N$. This problem has been studied in the algebra \cite{Cartwright_2013_The} and probability literature \cite{Auffinger_2012_Random, Auffinger_2013_Complexity}. It has been attacked from several angles: the replica trick to compute the Boltzmann--Gibbs @@ -99,7 +97,7 @@ introducing $\epsilon\in\mathbb C$, our energy is \begin{equation} \label{eq:constrained.hamiltonian} H = H_0+\frac p2\epsilon\left(N-\sum_i^Nz_i^2\right). \end{equation} -For a \emph{pure} $p$-spin, $\epsilon=H/N$ -- the average energy -- at any +It is easily shown that $\epsilon=H/N$ -- the average energy -- at any critical point. We choose to constrain our model by $z^2=N$ rather than $|z|^2=N$ in order to preserve the holomorphic nature of $H$. In addition, the nonholomorphic spherical constraint has a disturbing lack of critical points @@ -241,8 +239,9 @@ shift, or $\rho(\lambda)=\rho_0(\lambda+p\epsilon)$. The Hessian of the unconstr \partial_i\partial_jH_0 =\frac{p(p-1)}{p!}\sum_{k_1\cdots k_{p-2}}^NJ_{ijk_1\cdots k_{p-2}}z_{k_1}\cdots z_{k_{p-2}}, \end{equation} -which makes its ensemble that of Gaussian complex symmetric matrices. Given its -variances $\overline{|\partial_i\partial_j H_0|^2}=p(p-1)a^{p-2}/2N$ and +which makes its ensemble that of Gaussian complex symmetric matrices when the +direction along the constraint is neglected. Given its variances +$\overline{|\partial_i\partial_j H_0|^2}=p(p-1)a^{p-2}/2N$ and $\overline{(\partial_i\partial_j H_0)^2}=p(p-1)\kappa/2N$, its distribution of eigenvalues $\rho_0(\lambda)$ is constant inside the ellipse \begin{equation} \label{eq:ellipse} @@ -389,7 +388,7 @@ contained within is = \frac12N\log(p-1), \end{equation} half of \eqref{eq:bezout} and corresponding precisely to the number of critical -points of the real pure spherical $p$-spin model. (note the role of conjugation +points of the real $p$-spin model. (note the role of conjugation symmetry, already underlined in \cite{Bogomolny_1992_Distribution}). The full $\epsilon$-dependence of the real $p$-spin is recovered by this limit as $\epsilon$ is varied. @@ -398,7 +397,7 @@ $\epsilon$ is varied. \centering \includegraphics{fig/complexity.pdf} \caption{ - The complexity of the pure 3-spin model at $\epsilon=0$ as a function of + The complexity of the 3-spin model at $\epsilon=0$ as a function of $a$ at several values of $\kappa$. The dashed line shows $\frac12\log(p-1)$, while the dotted shows $\log(p-1)$. } \label{fig:complexity} @@ -421,7 +420,7 @@ for the real problem, in a region where we expect this not to happen. \includegraphics{fig/desert.pdf} \caption{ The minimum value of $a$ for which the complexity is positive as a function - of (real) energy $\epsilon$ for the pure 3-spin model at several values of + of (real) energy $\epsilon$ for the 3-spin model at several values of $\kappa$. } \label{fig:desert} \end{figure} @@ -451,7 +450,7 @@ physical dynamics, are a problem we hope to address in future work. \caption{ Energies at which states exist (green shaded region) and threshold energies - (black solid line) for the pure 3-spin model with + (black solid line) for the 3-spin model with $\kappa=\frac34e^{-i3\pi/4}$ and (a) $a=2$, (b) $a=1.325$, (c) $a=1.125$, and (d) $a=1$. No shaded region is shown in (d) because no states exist an any energy. -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf