From 0887d716415e8b20cb0ee3b65ca3bb9255706bdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:40:42 -0300
Subject: Updated funding information

---
 topology.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'topology.tex')

diff --git a/topology.tex b/topology.tex
index f89a6ca..0edd478 100644
--- a/topology.tex
+++ b/topology.tex
@@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ topics, and Giampaolo Folena for supplying his \textsc{dmft} data for the
 spherical spin glasses.
 
 \paragraph{Funding information}
-JK-D is supported by a \textsc{DynSysMath} Specific Initiative of the INFN.
+JK-D is supported by FAPESP Young Investigator Grant No.~2024/11114-1. JK-D also received support from the Simons Foundation Targeted Grant to ICTP-SAIFR and a \textsc{DynSysMath} Specific Initiative of the INFN.
 
 \appendix
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2


From 155a3fd57c53268b44ca2a22763b35992ef1f821 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:54:52 -0300
Subject: More bibliography tweaks

---
 topology.bib | 8 ++++----
 topology.tex | 8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

(limited to 'topology.tex')

diff --git a/topology.bib b/topology.bib
index 74cb7e0..bf5b2e8 100644
--- a/topology.bib
+++ b/topology.bib
@@ -675,19 +675,19 @@
  eprinttype = {arxiv}
 }
 
-@inproceedings{Mannelli_2019_Who,
+@inproceedings{SaraoMannelli_2019_Who,
  author = {Sarao Mannelli, Stefano and Biroli, Giulio and Cammarota, Chiara and Krzakala, Florent and Zdeborová, Lenka},
- title = {Who is Afraid of Big Bad Minima? Analysis of gradient-flow in spiked matrix-tensor models},
+ title = {Who is Afraid of Big Bad Minima? {A}nalysis of gradient-flow in spiked matrix-tensor models},
  publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},
  year = {2019},
  volume = {32},
  pages = {},
  url = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/file/fbad540b2f3b5638a9be9aa6a4d8e450-Paper.pdf},
  booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
- editor = {Wallach, H. and Larochelle, H. and Beygelzimer, A. and Alché-Buc, F. d' and Fox, E. and Garnett, R.}
+ editor = {Wallach, H. and Larochelle, H. and Beygelzimer, A. and d'Alché-Buc, F. and Fox, E. and Garnett, R.}
 }
 
-@inproceedings{Mannelli_2019_Passed,
+@inproceedings{SaraoMannelli_2019_Passed,
  author = {Sarao Mannelli, Stefano and Krzakala, Florent and Urbani, Pierfrancesco and Zdeborová, Lenka},
  title = {Passed \& Spurious: Descent Algorithms and Local Minima in Spiked Matrix-Tensor Models},
  publisher = {PMLR},
diff --git a/topology.tex b/topology.tex
index 0edd478..fcf99c7 100644
--- a/topology.tex
+++ b/topology.tex
@@ -793,20 +793,20 @@ Finally, a common extension of the spherical spin glasses is to add a
 deterministic piece to the energy, sometimes called a signal or a spike. Recent
 work argued that gradient descent can avoid being trapped in marginal minima
 and reach the vicinity of the signal if the set of trapping marginal minima has
-been destabilized by the presence of the signal \cite{Mannelli_2019_Passed,
-Mannelli_2019_Who}. The authors of Ref.~\cite{Mannelli_2019_Who}
+been destabilized by the presence of the signal \cite{SaraoMannelli_2019_Passed,
+SaraoMannelli_2019_Who}. The authors of Ref.~\cite{SaraoMannelli_2019_Who}
 conjecture based on \textsc{dmft} data for $2+3$ mixed spherical spin glasses that the
 trapping marginal minima are those at the traditional threshold energy
 $E_\text{th}$. However, Ref.~\cite{Folena_2023_On} demonstrated that in mixed
 $p+s$ spherical spin glasses with small $p$ and $s$, the difference between
 $E_\text{th}$ and the true trapping energy is difficult to resolve with the
 current precision of \textsc{dmft} integration schemes. Therefore,
-the authors of Ref.~\cite{Mannelli_2019_Who} may have incorrectly conflated the
+the authors of Ref.~\cite{SaraoMannelli_2019_Who} may have incorrectly conflated the
 threshold with the trapping marginal minima, and that the correct set of
 marginal minima that must be destabilized to reach a signal might be the same set
 that trap dynamics in the signal-free model. This paper conjectures that the important trapping minima
 are those at the shattering energy. Comparing the predictions of
-Ref.~\cite{Mannelli_2019_Who} to \textsc{dmft} simulations of a model with
+Ref.~\cite{SaraoMannelli_2019_Who} to \textsc{dmft} simulations of a model with
 better separation between $p$ and $s$ would help resolve this issue.
 
 \section{Conclusion}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2

