From d28e08b7e4637b5a44434f2909f6213818a3834b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaron Kent-Dobias Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 15:55:17 +0200 Subject: No mu^* in this version. --- frsb_kac-rice_letter.tex | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/frsb_kac-rice_letter.tex b/frsb_kac-rice_letter.tex index b4ba867..f216171 100644 --- a/frsb_kac-rice_letter.tex +++ b/frsb_kac-rice_letter.tex @@ -221,11 +221,11 @@ find the complexity everywhere. This is how the data in what follows was produce \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{figs/316_complexity_contour_1_letter.pdf} \caption{ - Complexity of the $3+16$ model in the energy $E$ and stability $\mu^*$ + Complexity of the $3+16$ model in the energy $E$ and stability $\mu$ plane. The right shows a detail of the left. Below the yellow marginal line - the complexity counts saddles of increasing index as $\mu^*$ decreases. + the complexity counts saddles of increasing index as $\mu$ decreases. Above the yellow marginal line the complexity counts minima of increasing - stability as $\mu^*$ increases. + stability as $\mu$ increases. } \label{fig:2rsb.contour} \end{figure} @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ model stall in a place where minima are exponentially subdominant. \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{figs/24_phases_letter.pdf} \caption{ `Phases' of the complexity for the $2+4$ model in the energy $E$ and - stability $\mu^*$ plane. The region shaded gray shows where the RS solution + stability $\mu$ plane. The region shaded gray shows where the RS solution is correct, while the region shaded red shows that where the FRSB solution is correct. The white region shows where the complexity is zero. } \label{fig:frsb.phases} -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2