From 58c5055d9e83f3345b90e8c089355c89d362fd57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 15:46:02 +0100
Subject: Some figure changes for PRE.

---
 frsb_kac-rice.tex | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

(limited to 'frsb_kac-rice.tex')

diff --git a/frsb_kac-rice.tex b/frsb_kac-rice.tex
index 3d59148..1d9b33c 100644
--- a/frsb_kac-rice.tex
+++ b/frsb_kac-rice.tex
@@ -999,8 +999,8 @@ replica symmetry breaking when minima or inherent states do not.
   \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/316_complexity.pdf}
 
   \caption{
-    Complexity of dominant saddles (blue), marginal minima (yellow), and
-    dominant minima (green) of the $3+16$ model. Solid lines show the result of
+    Complexity of dominant saddles, marginal minima, and
+    dominant minima of the $3+16$ model. Solid lines show the result of
     the 1RSB ansatz, while the dashed lines show that of a RS ansatz. The
     complexity of marginal minima is always below that of dominant critical
     points except at the black dot, where they are dominant.
@@ -1018,9 +1018,9 @@ replica symmetry breaking when minima or inherent states do not.
 
   \caption{
     Complexity of the $3+16$ model in the energy $E$ and stability $\mu^*$
-    plane. The right shows a detail of the left. Below the yellow marginal line
+    plane. The right shows a detail of the left. Below the horizontal marginal line
     the complexity counts saddles of increasing index as $\mu^*$ decreases.
-    Above the yellow marginal line the complexity counts minima of increasing
+    Above the horizontal marginal line the complexity counts minima of increasing
     stability as $\mu^*$ increases.
   } \label{fig:2rsb.contour}
 \end{figure}
@@ -1049,10 +1049,11 @@ model stall in a place where minima are exponentially subdominant.
 
   \caption{
     Detail of the `phases' of the $3+16$ model complexity as a function of
-    energy and stability. Above the yellow marginal stability line the
+    energy and stability. Above the horizontal marginal stability line the
     complexity counts saddles of fixed index, while below that line it counts
-    minima of fixed stability. The shaded red region shows places where the
-    complexity is described by the 1RSB solution, while the shaded gray region
+    minima of fixed stability. The shaded red region to the left of the
+    transition line shows places where the complexity is described by the 1RSB
+    solution, while the shaded gray region to the right of the transition line
     shows places where the complexity is described by the RS solution. In white
     regions the complexity is zero. Several interesting energies are marked
     with vertical black lines: the traditional `threshold' $E_\mathrm{th}$
@@ -1060,8 +1061,8 @@ model stall in a place where minima are exponentially subdominant.
     $E_\mathrm{alg}$ that bounds the performance of smooth algorithms, and the
     average energies at the $2$RSB and $1$RSB equilibrium transitions $\langle
     E\rangle_2$ and $\langle E\rangle_1$, respectively. Though the figure is
-    suggestive, $E_\mathrm{alg}$ lies at slightly lower energy than the termination of the RS
-    -- 1RSB transition line.
+    suggestive, $E_\mathrm{alg}$ lies at slightly lower energy than the
+    termination of the RS -- 1RSB transition line.
   } \label{fig:2rsb.phases}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -1160,9 +1161,10 @@ insight into lower-energy symmetry breaking in more general contexts.
   \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figs/24_phases.pdf}
   \caption{
     `Phases' of the complexity for the $2+4$ model in the energy $E$ and
-    stability $\mu^*$ plane. The region shaded gray shows where the RS solution
-    is correct, while the region shaded red shows that where the FRSB solution
-    is correct. The white region shows where the complexity is zero.
+    stability $\mu^*$ plane. The region shaded gray to the right of the
+    transition line shows where the RS solution is correct, while the region
+    shaded red to the left of the transition line shows that where the FRSB
+    solution is correct. The white region shows where the complexity is zero.
   } \label{fig:frsb.phases}
 \end{figure}
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2