From 8adc1990d25c24ccd363b11dbddb4212f8ad401f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 15:44:55 +0200
Subject: Refurbished 1RSB figures.

---
 frsb_kac-rice.tex | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

(limited to 'frsb_kac-rice.tex')

diff --git a/frsb_kac-rice.tex b/frsb_kac-rice.tex
index 7da916a..db36220 100644
--- a/frsb_kac-rice.tex
+++ b/frsb_kac-rice.tex
@@ -925,15 +925,29 @@ E\rangle_2$.
 
 \begin{figure}
   \centering
-  \begin{minipage}{0.7\textwidth}
-    \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_q.pdf}
-    \hspace{1em}
-    \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_x.pdf} \vspace{1em}\\
-    \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_b.pdf}
-    \hspace{1em}
-    \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_R.pdf}
-  \end{minipage}
-  \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_legend.pdf}
+  \includegraphics{figs/316_detail.pdf}
+
+  \caption{
+    Complexity of the $3+16$ model in the energy $E$ and stability $\mu$
+    plane. The right shows a detail of the left. The black line shows $\mu_m$,
+    which separates minima above from saddles below. The white lines show the
+    dominant stationary points at each energy, dashed when they are described
+    by a RS solution and solid for 1RSB. The red line shows the transition
+    between RS and 1RSB descriptions. The gray line shows where the RS
+    description predicts zero complexity.
+  }
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}
+  \centering
+  \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_q.pdf}\hfill
+  \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_rd.pdf}\hfill
+  \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_r1.pdf}\hspace{1em}
+  \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_legend.pdf} \vspace{0.5em}\\
+  \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_x.pdf}\hfill
+  \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_dd.pdf}\hfill
+  \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_d1.pdf}\hfill
+  \includegraphics{figs/316_comparison_b.pdf}
 
   \caption{
     Comparisons between the saddle parameters of the equilibrium solution to
@@ -946,25 +960,6 @@ E\rangle_2$.
   } \label{fig:2rsb.comparison}
 \end{figure}
 
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
 
 \subsection{Full RSB complexity}
 
-- 
cgit v1.3

