diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | proof_2.txt | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/proof_2.txt b/proof_2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7c011c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/proof_2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +> 1. Please provide zip code for affiliation on line 4. + +Our zip code is 75005. + +> 2. We checked with the Physical Review Research editor, who will allow your +> requested change regarding en dash. Please check. + +The changes look good, thank you! + +> 3. We have set Ref. [18] as per style. + +Ok. + +I don't know if this is standard, but the typesetting of the "ln" operators +seems funny - I am used to seeing thin spaces on each side of the operators +(like they appear around "Re", "exp", etc). It looks particularly strange in the +uses of "ln \mathcal N". Can the "ln" operators be typeset like the other math +operators? Here is a list of where they appear: + + - Lines 10 (twice), 117, and 119. + + - Equations (9), twice in (13), twice in (14), twice in (16), twice in (17), + and twice in (18). + + - Twice in the caption of Fig 2. |