changed figures to gnuplot figures

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/essential-ising.tex b/essential-ising.tex
index 2d8af31..b9ee8a2 100644
--- a/essential-ising.tex
+++ b/essential-ising.tex
@@ -202,22 +202,24 @@ in the insets of those figures. As can be seen, there is very good agreement
 between our proposed functional forms and what is measured.
 
 \begin{figure}
-  \includegraphics{figs/fig_sus-collapse}
+  \input{figs/fig-sus}
+  %\includegraphics{figs/fig_sus-collapse}
   \caption{Fit of scaling form \eqref{eq:sus_scaling} to numeric data from a
   $L=1024$ square-lattice Ising model.
 Different colored points show different values of $t$, which vary from
 $0.01$, $0.02$, \dots, $0.1$. Solid black line shows fitted form, with
-$C=0.0107\pm0.0011$ and $B=0.172\pm0.036$.}
+$C=0.0111\pm0.0023$ and $B=0.173\pm0.072$.}
   \label{fig:sus}
 \end{figure}
 
 \begin{figure}
-  \includegraphics{figs/fig_mag-collapse}
+  \input{figs/fig-mag}
+  %\includegraphics{figs/fig_mag-collapse}
   \caption{Fit of scaling form \eqref{eq:mag_scaling} to numeric data from a
 $L=1024$ square-lattice Ising model. Different colored points show different
 values of $t$, which vary from $0.01$, $0.02$, \dots, $0.1$. Solid black lines
-shows fitted form, with $\mathcal M(0)=1.21055\pm0.00031$,
-$D=0.09440\pm0.00033$, and $B=0.085249\pm0.00099$.}
+shows fitted form, with $\mathcal M(0)=1.21039\pm0.00031$,
+$D=0.09400\pm0.00035$, and $B=0.0861\pm0.0010$.}
   \label{fig:mag}
 \end{figure}