1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
|
%
% Created by Jaron Kent-Dobias on Thu Apr 20 12:50:56 EDT 2017.
% Copyright (c) 2017 Jaron Kent-Dobias. All rights reserved.
%
\documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]{revtex4-1}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,latexsym,mathtools,xifthen}
% uncomment to label only equations that are referenced in the text
%\mathtoolsset{showonlyrefs=true}
% I want labels but don't want to type out ``equation''
\def\[{\begin{equation}}
\def\]{\end{equation}}
% math not built-in
\def\arcsinh{\mathop{\mathrm{arcsinh}}\nolimits}
\def\arccosh{\mathop{\mathrm{arccosh}}\nolimits}
\def\ei{\mathop{\mathrm{Ei}}\nolimits} % exponential integral Ei
\def\re{\mathop{\mathrm{Re}}\nolimits}
\def\im{\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\nolimits}
\def\sgn{\mathop{\mathrm{sgn}}\nolimits}
\def\dd{d} % differential
\def\O{O} % big O
\def\o{o} % little O
% subscript for ``critical'' values, e.g., T_\c
\def\c{\mathrm c}
% scaling functions
\def\fM{\mathcal M} % magnetization
\def\fX{\mathcal Y} % susceptibility
\def\fF{\mathcal F} % free energy
\def\fiF{\mathcal H} % imaginary free energy
\def\fS{\mathcal S} % surface tension
\def\fG{\mathcal G} % exponential factor
% lattice types
\def\sq{\mathrm{sq}}
\def\tri{\mathrm{tri}}
\def\hex{\mathrm{hex}}
% dimensions
\def\dim{d}
\def\twodee{\textsc{2d} }
\def\threedee{\textsc{3d} }
\def\fourdee{\textsc{4d} }
% fancy partial derivative
\newcommand\pd[3][]{
\ifthenelse{\isempty{#1}}
{\def\tmp{}}
{\def\tmp{^#1}}
\frac{\partial\tmp#2}{\partial#3\tmp}
}
% used to reformat display math to fit in two-column ``reprint'' mode
\makeatletter
\newif\ifreprint
\@ifclasswith{revtex4-1}{reprint}{\reprinttrue}{\reprintfalse}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\title{Essential Singularities in Universal Scaling Functions at the Ising Coexistence Line}
\author{Jaron Kent-Dobias}
\author{James P.~Sethna}
\affiliation{Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA}
\date\today
\begin{abstract}
Renormalization group ideas and results from critical droplet theory are
used to construct a scaling ansatz for the imaginary component of the free
energy of an Ising model in its metastable state close to the critical
point. The analytic properties of the free energy are used to determine
scaling functions for the free energy in the vicinity of the critical point
and the abrupt transition line. These functions have essential singularities
at zero field. Analogous forms for the magnetization and susceptibility in
two dimensions are fit to numeric data and show good agreement.
\end{abstract}
\maketitle
The Ising model is the canonical example of a system with a continuous phase
transition, and the study of its singular properties marked the first success
of the renormalization group (\textsc{rg}) method in statistical physics
\cite{wilson.1971.renormalization}. Its status makes sense: it's a simple
model whose continuous phase transition contains all the essential features of
more complex ones, but admits \textsc{rg} methods in a straightforward way and
has exact solutions in certain dimensions and for certain parameter
restrictions. However, the Ising critical point is not simply a continuous
transition: it also ends a line of abrupt phase transitions extending from it
at zero field below the critical temperature. Though typically neglected in
\textsc{rg} scaling analyses of the critical point, we demonstrate that there
are numerically measurable contributions to scaling due to the abrupt
transition line that cannot be accounted for by analytic changes of control or
thermodynamic variables.
\textsc{Rg} analysis predicts that the singular part of the free energy per
site $F$ as a function of reduced temperature $t=1-T_\c/T$ and field $h=H/T$
in the vicinity of the critical point takes the scaling form
$F(t,h)=|t|^{2-\alpha}\fF(h|t|^{-\beta\delta})$ for the low temperature phase
$t<0$ \cite{cardy.1996.scaling}. When studying the properties of the Ising
critical point, it is nearly always assumed that the universal scaling
function $\fF$ is analytic, i.e., has a convergent Taylor series. However, it
has long been known that there exists an essential singularity in $\fF$ at
zero argument, though its effects have long been believed to be unobservable
\cite{fisher.1967.condensation}, or simply just neglected
\cite{guida.1997.3dising,schofield.1969.parametric,schofield.1969.correlation,caselle.2001.critical,josephson.1969.equation,fisher.1999.trigonometric}.
With careful analysis, we have found that assuming the presence of the
essential singularity is predictive of the scaling form of e.g. the
susceptibility and magnetization.
The provenance of the essential singularity can be understood using the
methods of critical droplet theory for the decay of an Ising system in a
metastable state, i.e., an equilibrium Ising state for $T<T_\c$, $H>0$
subjected to a small negative external field $H<0$. The existence of an
essential singularity has also been suggested by transfer matrix
\cite{mccraw.1978.metastability,enting.1980.investigation} and \textsc{rg}
methods \cite{klein.1976.essential}. It has long been known that the decay
rate $\Gamma$ of metastable states in statistical mechanics is often related
to the metastable free energy $F$ by $\Gamma\propto\im F$
\cite{langer.1969.metastable,penrose.1987.rigorous,gaveau.1989.analytic,privman.1982.analytic}.
`Metastable free energy' can be thought of as either an analytic continuation
of the free energy through the abrupt phase transition, or restriction of the
partition function trace to states in the vicinity of the local free energy
minimum that characterizes the metastable state. In any case, the free energy
develops a nonzero imaginary part in the metastable region. Heuristically,
this can be thought of as similar to what happens in quantum mechanics with a
non-unitary Hamiltonian: the imaginary part describes loss of probability in
the system that corresponds to decay.
In critical droplet theory, the metastable state decays when a domain of the
equilibrium state forms whose surface-energy cost for growth is outweighed by
bulk-energy gains. There is numerical evidence that, near the critical point,
droplets are spherical \cite{gunther.1993.transfer-matrix}. The free energy
cost of the surface of a droplet of radius $R$ is $\Sigma S_\dim R^{\dim-1}$
and that of its bulk is $-M|H|V_\dim R^\dim$, where $S_\dim$ and $V_\dim$ are
the surface area and volume of a $(\dim-1)$-sphere, respectively, and $\Sigma$
is the surface tension of the equilibrium--metastable interface. The critical
droplet size then is $R_\c=(\dim-1)\Sigma/M|H|$ and the free energy of the
critical droplet is $\Delta
F_\c=\pi^{\dim/2}\Sigma^\dim((\dim-1)/M|H|)^{\dim-1}/\Gamma(1+\dim/2)$.
Assuming the typical singular scaling forms
$\Sigma/T=|t|^\mu\fS(h|t|^{-\beta\delta})$ and $M=|t|^\beta\mathcal
M(h|t|^{-\beta\delta})$ and using known hyperscaling relations
\cite{widom.1981.interface}, this implies a scaling form
\def\eqcritformone{
T\frac{\pi^{\dim/2}(\dim-1)^{\dim-1}}{\Gamma(1+\dim/2)}
\frac{\fS^\dim(h|t|^{-\beta\delta})}{(-h|t|^{-\beta\delta}
\fM(h|t|^{-\beta\delta}))^{\dim-1}}
}
\def\eqcritformtwo{
T\fG^{-(\dim-1)}(h|t|^{-\beta\delta})
}
\ifreprint
\[
\begin{aligned}
\Delta F_\c
&=\eqcritformone\\
&\sim\eqcritformtwo.
\end{aligned}
\]
\else
\[
\Delta F_\c=\eqcritformone\sim\eqcritformtwo.
\]
\fi
Since both surface tension and magnetization are finite and nonzero for $H=0$
at $T<T_\c$, $\fG(X)=-BX+\O(X^2)$ for small negative $X$ with
\[
B=\frac{\fM(0)}{\dim-1}\bigg(\frac{\Gamma(1+\dim/2)}
{\pi^{\dim/2}\fS(0)^\dim}\bigg)^{1/(\dim-1)}.
\]
This first term in the scaling function $\fG$ is related to the ratio between
the correlation length $\xi$ and the critical domain radius $R_\c$, with
\[
Bh|t|^{-\beta\delta}
=\frac\xi{R_\c}\bigg(\frac{\Gamma(1+\dim/2)}
{\pi^{\dim/2}\fS(0)(\xi_0^-)^{\dim-1}}\bigg)^{1/(\dim-1)}
\]
where the critical amplitude for the correlation length $\xi_0^-$ is defined
by $\xi=\xi_0^-|t|^{-\nu}$ for $t<T_\c$. Since $\fS(0)(\xi_0^-)^{\dim-1}$ is a
universal amplitude ratio \cite{zinn.1996.universal},
$(Bh|t|^{-\beta\delta})/(\xi/R_\c)$ is a universal quantity. The decay rate
of the metastable state is proportional to the Boltzmann factor for the
creation of a critical droplet, yielding
\[
\im F\sim\Gamma\propto e^{-\Delta F_\c/T}
=e^{-\fG(h|t|^{-\beta\delta})^{-(\dim-1)}}.
\]
For $d>1$ this function has an essential singularity in the invariant
combination $h|t|^{-\beta\delta}$.
This form of $\im F$ for small $h$ is well known
\cite{langer.1967.condensation,harris.1984.metastability}. We make the
scaling ansatz that the imaginary part of the metastable free energy has the
same singular behavior as the real part of the equilibrium free energy, and
that for small $t$, $h$, $\im F(t,h)=|t|^{2-\alpha}\fiF(h|t|^{-\beta\delta})$,
where
\[
\fiF(X)=A\Theta(-X)(-BX)^be^{-1/(-BX)^{\dim-1}}
\label{eq:im.scaling}
\]
and $\Theta$ is the Heaviside function. Results from combining an analysis of
fluctuations on the surface of critical droplets with \textsc{rg} recursion
relations suggest that $b=-(d-3)d/2$ for $d=2,4$ and $b=-7/3$ for $d=3$
\cite{houghton.1980.metastable,rudnick.1976.equations,gunther.1980.goldstone}.
Assuming that $F$ is analytic in the upper complex-$h$ plane, the real part of
$F$ in the equilibrium state can be extracted from this imaginary metastable
free energy using the Kramers--Kronig relation
\[
\re F(t,h)=\frac1\pi\int_{-\infty}^\infty\frac{\im F(t,h')}{h'-h}\,\dd h'.
\label{eq:kram-kron}
\]
This relationship has been used to compute high-order moments of the free
energy in $H$ in good agreement with transfer matrix expansions
\cite{lowe.1980.instantons}. Here, we compute the integral to come to explicit
functional forms. In \threedee and \fourdee this can be computed explicitly
given our scaling ansatz, yielding
\def\eqthreedeeone{
\fF^\threedee(Y/B)&=
\frac{A}{12}\frac{e^{-1/Y^2}}{Y^2}
\bigg[\Gamma(\tfrac16)E_{7/6}(-Y^{-2})
}
\def\eqthreedeetwo{
-4Y\Gamma(\tfrac23)E_{5/3}(-Y^{-2})\bigg]
}
\def\eqfourdeeone{
\fF^\fourdee(Y/B)&=
-\frac{A}{9\pi}\frac{e^{1/Y^3}}{Y^2}
\Big[3\ei(-Y^{-3})
}
\def\eqfourdeetwo{
+3\Gamma(\tfrac23)\Gamma(\tfrac13,Y^{-3})
+\Gamma(\tfrac13)\Gamma(-\tfrac13,Y^{-3})\Big]
}
\ifreprint
\begin{align}
&\begin{aligned}
\eqthreedeeone\\
&\hspace{7em}
\eqthreedeetwo
\end{aligned}
\\
&\begin{aligned}
\eqfourdeeone
\\
&\hspace{-0.5em}
\eqfourdeetwo.
\end{aligned}
\end{align}
\else
\begin{align}
\eqthreedeeone\eqthreedeetwo
\\
\eqfourdeeone\eqfourdeetwo.
\end{align}
\fi
At the level of truncation of \eqref{eq:im.scaling} at which we are working
the Kramers--Kronig relation does not converge in \twodee. However, higher
moments can still be extracted, e.g., the susceptibility, by taking
\[
\chi=\pd MH=-\frac1{T_\c}\pd[2]Fh
=-\frac2{\pi T_\c}\int_{-\infty}^\infty\frac{\im F(t,h')}{(h'-h)^3}\,\dd h'.
\]
With a scaling form defined by $T_\c\chi=|t|^{-\gamma}\fX(h|t|^{-\beta\delta})$,
this yields
\[
\fX^\twodee(Y/B)=\frac{AB^2}{\pi Y^3}\big[Y(Y-1)-e^{1/Y}\ei(-1/Y)\big]
\label{eq:sus_scaling}
\]
Scaling forms for the free energy can then be extracted by direct integration
and their constants of integration fixed by known zero field values, yielding
\begin{align}
\label{eq:mag_scaling}
\fM^\twodee(Y/B)
&=\fM(0)+\frac{AB}{\pi}\bigg(1-\frac{Y-1}Ye^{1/Y}\ei(-1/Y)\bigg)\\
\fF^\twodee(Y/B)
&=-Y\bigg(\frac{\fM(0)}B-\frac{A}\pi e^{1/Y}\ei(-1/Y)\bigg)
\end{align}
with $F(t,h)=|t|^{2-\alpha}\fF(h|t|^{-\beta\delta})+t^{2-\alpha}\log|t|$ in
two dimensions.
How are these functional forms to be interpreted? Though the scaling function
\eqref{eq:im.scaling} for the imaginary free energy of the metastable state is
asymptotically correct sufficiently close to the critical point, the results
of the integral relation \eqref{eq:kram-kron} are not, since there is no limit
of $t$ or $h$ in which it becomes arbitrarily correct for a given truncation
of \eqref{eq:im.scaling}. It is well established that this method of using
unphysical or metastable elements of a theory to extract properties of the
stable or equilibrium theory is only accurate for high moments of those
predictions \cite{parisi.1977.asymptotic,bogomolny.1977.dispersion}. The
functions above should be understood as possessing exactly the correct
singularity at the coexistence line, but requiring polynomial corrections,
especially for smaller integer powers. Using these forms in conjunction with
existing methods of describing the critical equation of state or critical
properties with analytic functions in $h$ will incorporate these low-order
corrections while preserving the correct singular structure. In other words,
the scaling functions can be \emph{exactly} described by
$\tilde\fF(X)=\fF(X)+f(X)$ for some analytic function $f$. Higher order terms
in the expansion of $\tilde\fF$ become asymptotically equal to those of $\fF$
because, as an analytic function, progressively higher order terms of $f$ must
eventually become arbitrarily small \cite{flanigan.1972.complex}.
How predictive are these scaling forms in the proximity of the critical point
and the abrupt transition line? We simulated the \twodee Ising model on square
lattice using a form of the Wolff algorithm modified to remain efficient in
the presence of an external field. Briefly, the external field $H$ is applied
by adding an extra spin $s_0$ with coupling $|H|$ to all others
\cite{dimitrovic.1991.finite}. A quickly converging estimate for the
magnetization in the finite-size system was then made by taking
$M=\sgn(H)s_0\sum s_i$, i.e., the magnetization relative to the external spin.
Data was then taken for susceptibility and magnetization for
$T_\c-T,H\leq0.1$. This data, rescaled as appropriate to collapse onto a
single curve, is plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig:scaling_fits}.
For the \twodee Ising model on a square lattice, exact results at zero
temperature have $\fS(0)=4/T_\c$, $\fM(0)=(2^{5/2}\arcsinh1)^\beta$
\cite{onsager.1944.crystal}, and $\fX(0)=C_0^-=0.025\,536\,971\,9$ \cite{barouch.1973.susceptibility}, so that
$B=T_\c^2\fM(0)/\pi\fS(0)^2=(2^{27/16}\pi(\arcsinh1)^{15/8})^{-1}$. If we
assume incorrectly that \eqref{eq:sus_scaling} is the true asymptotic form of
the susceptibility scaling function, then
$T_\c\chi(t,0)|t|^\gamma=\lim_{X\to0}\fX^\twodee(X)=2AB^2/\pi$ and the constant
$A$ is fixed to $A=\pi\fX(0)/2B^2=2^{19/8}\pi^3(\arcsinh1)^{15/4}C_0^-$. The
resulting scaling functions $\fX$ and $\fM$ are plotted as solid lines in
Fig.~\ref{fig:scaling_fits}. As can be seen, there is very good agreement
between our proposed functional forms and what is measured. However, there
are systematic differences that can be seen most clearly in the magnetization.
Since our method is known to only be accurate for high moments of the free
energy, we should expect that low moments require corrections. Therefore, we
also fit those corrections using
\begin{align}
\tilde\fX^\twodee(X)&=\fX^\twodee(X)+\sum_{n=0}^Nf_n(BX)\label{eq:sus_scaling_poly}\\
\tilde\fM^\twodee(X)&=\fM^\twodee(X)+\frac{T_\c}B\sum_{n=0}^NF_n(BX)\label{eq:mag_scaling_poly}
\end{align}
where $F_n'(Y)=f_n(Y)$ and
\[
\begin{aligned}
f_n(Y)&=\frac{c_nx^n}{1+(\lambda Y)^{n+1}}\\
F_n(Y)&=\frac{c_n\lambda^{-(n+1)}}{n+1}\log(1+(\lambda Y)^{n+1}).
\end{aligned}
\label{eq:poly}
\]
The functions $f_n$ have been chosen to be pure integer power laws for small
argument, but vanish appropriately at large argument. This is necessary
because the susceptibility vanishes with $h|t|^{-\beta\delta}$ while bare
polynomial corrections would not. We fit these functions to known moments of
the free energy's scaling function
\cite{mangazeev.2008.variational,mangazeev.2010.scaling} our numeric data
for $N=0$. The
resulting curves are also plotted as dashed lines in
Fig.~\ref{fig:scaling_fits}. Our singular scaling function with one low-order
correction appears to match data quite well.
\begin{figure}
\input{fig-susmag}
\caption{
Scaling functions for (top) the susceptibility and (bottom) the
magnetization plotted in terms of the invariant combination
$h|t|^{-\beta\delta}$. Points with error bars show data with sampling
error taken from simulations of a $4096\times4096$ square-lattice Ising
model with periodic boundary conditions and $T_\c-T=0.01,0.02,\ldots,0.1$
and $H=0.1\times(1,2^{-1/4},\ldots,2^{-50/4})$. Color denotes the value of
$T$, with red corresponding to $0.01$ and violet to $0.1$. The solid lines
show our analytic results \eqref{eq:sus_scaling} and
\eqref{eq:mag_scaling}, while the dashed lines show fits of
\eqref{eq:sus_scaling_poly} and \eqref{eq:mag_scaling_poly} to the data
for $N=0$, with $c_0=-0.0124$ and $\lambda=1.77$.
}
\label{fig:scaling_fits}
\end{figure}
Abrupt phase transitions, such as the jump in magnetization in the Ising
model below $T_\c$, are known to imply essential singularities in the free
energy that are usually thought to be unobservable in practice. We have
argued that this essential singularity controls the universal scaling
behavior near continuous phase transitions, and have derived an explicit
analytical form for the singularity in the free energy, magnetization,
and susceptibility for the Ising model. We have developed a Wolff algorithm
for the Ising model in a field, and showed that incorporating our singularity
into the scaling function gives good convergence to the simulations in \twodee.
Our results should allow improved high-precision functional forms for the free
energy~\cite{caselle.2001.critical}, and should have implications for the scaling
of correlation functions~\cite{chen.2013.universal,wu.1976.spin}. Our methods might be generalized
to predict similar singularities in systems where nucleation and metastability
are proximate to continuous phase transitions, such as 2D superfluid
transitions~\cite{ambegaokar.1978.dissipation,ambegaokar.1980.dynamics}, the melting of 2D crystals~\cite{XXX}, and
freezing transitions in glasses, spin glasses, and other disordered systems.
%We have used results from the properties of the metastable Ising ferromagnet
%and the analytic nature of the free energy to derive universal scaling
%functions for the free energy, and in \twodee the magnetization and
%susceptibility, in the limit of small $t<0$ and $h$. Because of an essential
%singularity in these functions at $h=0$---the abrupt transition line---their
%form cannot be brought into that of any regular function by analytic
%redefinition of control or thermodynamic variables. These predictions match
%the results of simulations well. Having demonstrated that the essential
%singularity in thermodynamic functions at the abrupt transition leads to
%observable scaling effects, we hope that these functional forms will be used in
%conjunction with traditional perturbation methods to better express the
%equation of state of the Ising model in the whole of its parameter space.
\begin{acknowledgments}
The authors would like to thank Tom Lubensky, Andrea Liu, and Randy Kamien
for helpful conversations. JPS thanks Jim Langer for past inspiration,
guidance, and encouragement. This work was supported by NSF grants
DMR-1312160 and DMR-1719490.
\end{acknowledgments}
\bibliography{essential-ising}
\end{document}
|