summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--phase_diagram_experiments.pdfbin17376 -> 23923 bytes
-rw-r--r--proof_response_v1.txt43
-rw-r--r--proofs/BN13654.pdfbin0 -> 838842 bytes
-rw-r--r--proofs/BN13654_redline.pdfbin0 -> 228570 bytes
4 files changed, 43 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/phase_diagram_experiments.pdf b/phase_diagram_experiments.pdf
index a354223..88bef95 100644
--- a/phase_diagram_experiments.pdf
+++ b/phase_diagram_experiments.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/proof_response_v1.txt b/proof_response_v1.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dba8cf3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/proof_response_v1.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+
+# Responses to specific questions and comments
+
+ 1. Our ZIP code is 14853.
+
+ 2. Here is the DOI for that reference: https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.82.013601
+
+ 3. OP is "order parameter."
+
+ 4. u-reps are irreducible representations of the point group that include an
+ inversion of space. The u, like the g subscripts in our paper, is simply a
+ label and not an abbreviation as far as we know. It might be replaced by
+ "u representations."
+
+ 5. LBCO is the chemical compound lanthanum barium copper oxide.
+
+ 6. We prefer to retain "falsify" over "disprove" because of its connection
+ with the philosophy of science of falsifiability, but the meaning of the
+ sentence is not otherwise affected by the change.
+
+ 7. Unfortunately an alternative does not exist right now.
+
+ 8. The Pergamon Press operated out of Oxford, UK.
+
+ 9. By "check" do you mean the breve on the 'ĭ' at the end of their name? That
+ accent appears in author listing in the 3rd edition of that text.
+
+ Q. Here is all the information I have, taken from the copy of the article in my possession:
+
+ V. L. Ginzburg, "Some remarks on phase transitions of the second kind and the
+ microscopic theory of ferroelectric materials," Soviet Physics: Solid State,
+ Vol. 2, No. 9, pp. 1824--1834 (1961). Translated from Fizika Tverdogo Tela,
+ Vol. 2, No. 9, pp. 2031--2043 (September 1960).
+
+
+# Other corrections
+
+The incorrect "it" on line 409 should have been replaced with "in," so that the
+line instead reads "Upon substitution of (A3) and expansion to quadratic order
+in <η(x)>, we find"
+
+Everything else appears to be correct.
+
diff --git a/proofs/BN13654.pdf b/proofs/BN13654.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c9f1a25
--- /dev/null
+++ b/proofs/BN13654.pdf
Binary files differ
diff --git a/proofs/BN13654_redline.pdf b/proofs/BN13654_redline.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6c781ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/proofs/BN13654_redline.pdf
Binary files differ