diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'referee_comments.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | referee_comments.txt | 50 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/referee_comments.txt b/referee_comments.txt index 6bf1273..21b6552 100644 --- a/referee_comments.txt +++ b/referee_comments.txt @@ -1,36 +1,3 @@ -> Re: BN13654 -> Elastic properties of hidden order in URu 2Si 2 are reproduced by a -> staggered nematic -> by Jaron Kent-Dobias, Michael Matty, and B. J. Ramshaw -> -> Dear Jaron Kent-Dobias, -> -> The above manuscript has been reviewed by two of our referees. -> Comments from the reports appear below. -> -> These comments suggest that the present manuscript is not suitable for -> publication in the Physical Review. -> -> Yours sincerely, -> -> Sarma Kancharla -> Associate Editor -> Physical Review B -> Email: prb@aps.org -> https://journals.aps.org/prb/ -> -> NEWS FROM THE PHYSICAL REVIEW JOURNALS -> -> Announcing a new Physical Review journal: PRX Quantum -> https://go.aps.org/2Q0uVwP -> -> Celebrating 50 years of Physical Review A, B, C, and D -> https://go.aps.org/2IDjVBM -> -> APS is offering promotional open access fee discounts on most -> journals in 2020 -> https://go.aps.org/3388lYG -> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Report of the First Referee -- BN13654/Kent-Dobias > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- @@ -50,9 +17,11 @@ > look plausible as the disagreement does not appear to develop slowly > as T decreases, but appears immediately below TN, where eta is small. -The disagreement between the theory at low temperature is resolved by the -addition of an additional interaction in the mean-field free energy of the form -ε²η², now shown in Fig. 2 as a thin black line. +The disagreement between the theory at low temperature is largely resolved by +the addition of an additional interaction in the mean-field free energy of the +form ε²η². In a new appendix, we have worked through the mean field modulus +implied with this new interaction and a fit is now shown in Fig. 2 as a thin +black line. > Is it not clear how discriminatory is the agreement above TN in 2a, 2b > and 2c. Are calculation results robust over a wide range of fitting @@ -133,10 +102,13 @@ phase, since their contribution to the response function is zero above T_c. > The authors do not provide any resolution on that point which is the > most relevant in this problem. -The articles below provide experimental evidence for the formation of -superlattice structure along the c-axis at ambient pressure. +The articles below, also cited in our work, all provide experimental evidence +for the formation of superlattice structure along the c-axis at ambient +pressure. -[I pulled these from our citation on the estimate for q_*. Do they actually provide the evidence we need?] +[I pulled these from our citation on the estimate for q_*. Do they actually +provide the evidence we need? Can someone who knows more about these techniques +elaborate?] https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.127002 https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.43.12809 |