summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/response.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>2023-11-28 16:36:42 +0100
committerJaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>2023-11-28 16:36:42 +0100
commitf4c4f40405bf306880edeb8ceb43a7469b54bb92 (patch)
tree62de100a9ce18bd6ffb550c5bc63b345933af528 /response.md
parent6ffa6f15dbac91e6853c3aad20a0fa6d342005c2 (diff)
downloadSciPostPhys_16_001-f4c4f40405bf306880edeb8ceb43a7469b54bb92.tar.gz
SciPostPhys_16_001-f4c4f40405bf306880edeb8ceb43a7469b54bb92.tar.bz2
SciPostPhys_16_001-f4c4f40405bf306880edeb8ceb43a7469b54bb92.zip
Began response to one point.
Diffstat (limited to 'response.md')
-rw-r--r--response.md2
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/response.md b/response.md
index 351a221..f6fcfbf 100644
--- a/response.md
+++ b/response.md
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ The suggestion of the referee was good and was implemented in the new manuscript
> saddle with mu\<mu, but with energies smaller than the threshold energy", so?
> What is the implication? This misses a conclusion.
+These low-lying saddles represent large-deviations from the typical complexity
+
> Sec.3.1, the author comments on the similarity with the pure model, without
> explaining what is similar. What should we expect on the p-spin? At least the
> relevant aspects. It would also be useful to plot a version of Fig.3 for the