diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | response.tex | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/response.tex b/response.tex index 4addddf..ab2107c 100644 --- a/response.tex +++ b/response.tex @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ in the direction of highlighting the importance of having a full solution. In p we have emphasized that going to the full replica treatment uncovers a phase-space structure that needs to be taken into account, and that is absent in the annealed treatment. -We have thus added the paragraph: +Among other changes, we have added the paragraph: \begin{quote} Having a full, exact (`quenched') solution of the generic problem is not @@ -60,11 +60,12 @@ barrier crossing (which barriers?) \footfullcite{Ros_2019_Complexity, Ros_2021_D (which end in what kind of target states?). \end{quote} + Both referees find that our paper is clearly written but technical, and that its topic of ``the different RSB schemes'' are not suitable for a broad audience. This is surprising to the authors, since a quick search on Google Scholar reveals several recent PRLs with heavy use of -RSB schemes. +RSB schemes. We would also like to submit to the referees that it is somewhat incongruous that the solution to a problem that had remained open for 42 years -- during @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ than the previous ones. Below, we respond to the referees' comments. +A comprehensive accounting of the changes to our manuscript can be found appended to this letter. \begin{quote} \begin{center} |