diff options
author | kurchan.jorge <kurchan.jorge@gmail.com> | 2020-12-07 15:01:07 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | overleaf <overleaf@localhost> | 2020-12-07 15:01:09 +0000 |
commit | e15fe95a921608c187011980928fd81d9a070fd6 (patch) | |
tree | 4276ce99e02a384affb5cffcdd991213433042ad | |
parent | 5747a09486d70b3302d06757feb45aeca13475d0 (diff) | |
download | PRR_3_023064-e15fe95a921608c187011980928fd81d9a070fd6.tar.gz PRR_3_023064-e15fe95a921608c187011980928fd81d9a070fd6.tar.bz2 PRR_3_023064-e15fe95a921608c187011980928fd81d9a070fd6.zip |
Update on Overleaf.
-rw-r--r-- | bezout.tex | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ where the $J_{i_1\cdots i_p}$ are real Gaussian variables and the $z_i$ are real to a sphere $\sum_i z_i^2=N$. This problem has been attacked from several angles: the replica trick to compute the Boltzmann-Gibbs distribution, -a Kac-Rice \cite{Kac,Fyodorov} procedure (similar to the Fadeev-Popov inte to compute the number of saddle-points of the energy function, and the gradient-descent -- or more generally Langevin -- dynamics staring from a high-energy configuration. +a Kac-Rice \cite{Kac,Fyodorov} procedure (similar to the Fadeev-Popov integral to compute the number of saddle-points of the energy function, and the gradient-descent -- or more generally Langevin -- dynamics staring from a high-energy configuration. Thanks to the relative simplicity of the energy, all these approaches are possible analytically in the large $N$ limit. In th |