summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/appeal.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'appeal.tex')
-rw-r--r--appeal.tex77
1 files changed, 77 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/appeal.tex b/appeal.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6af3109
--- /dev/null
+++ b/appeal.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+\documentclass[a4paper]{letter}
+
+\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % why not type "Bézout" with unicode?
+\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % vector fonts plz
+\usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath} % Times for PR
+\usepackage[
+ colorlinks=true,
+ urlcolor=purple,
+ linkcolor=black,
+ citecolor=black,
+ filecolor=black
+]{hyperref} % ref and cite links with pretty colors
+\usepackage{xcolor}
+\usepackage[style=phys]{biblatex}
+
+\addbibresource{bezout.bib}
+
+\signature{
+ \vspace{-6\medskipamount}
+ \smallskip
+ Jaron Kent-Dobias \& Jorge Kurchan
+}
+
+\address{
+ Laboratoire de Physique\\
+ Ecole Normale Sup\'erieure\\
+ 24 rue Lhomond\\
+ 75005 Paris
+}
+
+\begin{document}
+\begin{letter}{
+ Editorial Office\\
+ Physical Review Letters\\
+ 1 Research Road\\
+ Ridge, NY 11961
+}
+
+\opening{To the editors of Physical Review,}
+
+We wish to appeal your decision on our manuscript \emph{Complex complex
+landscapes}, which received a single referee report.
+
+We believe that the referee's overall criticisms of our paper are not entirely
+justified (and above all, difficult to answer). We have, however, submitted a
+revised manuscript clarifying the specific aspects that the referee found trying.
+
+The referee seems particularly worried that we have cited articles that are not
+themselves sufficiently cited, so we thought it may be useful propose a set of
+referees that are beyond suspicion of incompetence or uncitedness:
+
+\begin{tabular}{ll}
+ G Ben Arous & Courant \\
+ M Berry & Bristol\\
+ Y Fyodorov & King's College London \\
+ Daniel Fisher& Stanford\\
+ T Lubensky & U Penn\\
+ M Moore & Manchester \\
+ E Witten & IAS Princeton
+\end{tabular}
+
+We have also pointed out some very first results of the geometric implications for a
+random complex landscape of our calculation, something we plan to expend on in
+a future full article.
+
+Let us conclude by remarking that, although it is probably true that this paper will not
+make more than one hundred citations next year, we are confident that it will still
+be considered relevant in ten years time.
+
+
+\closing{Sincerely,}
+
+\vspace{1em}
+
+\end{letter}
+
+\end{document}