1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
|
\documentclass[a4paper]{letter}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % why not type "Bézout" with unicode?
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % vector fonts plz
\usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath} % Times for PR
\usepackage[
colorlinks=true,
urlcolor=purple,
linkcolor=black,
citecolor=black,
filecolor=black
]{hyperref} % ref and cite links with pretty colors
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage[style=phys]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{bezout.bib}
\signature{
\vspace{-6\medskipamount}
\smallskip
Jaron Kent-Dobias \& Jorge Kurchan
}
\address{
Laboratoire de Physique\\
Ecole Normale Sup\'erieure\\
24 rue Lhomond\\
75005 Paris
}
\begin{document}
\begin{letter}{
Editorial Office\\
Physical Review Letters\\
1 Research Road\\
Ridge, NY 11961
}
\opening{To the editors of Physical Review,}
We wish to appeal your decision on our manuscript LZ16835, \emph{Complex
complex landscapes}, which received a single referee report.
We believe that the criticisms that the referee addresses to our paper are
not entirely justified (and above all, difficult to answer). We have, however,
clarified as much as possible the parts that the referee found trying.
The referee is particularly worried that we have cited articles that are not
themselves sufficiently cited, so we thought that it may be useful at this
point to propose a set of referees that are beyond suspicion of incompetence or
uncitedness:
\begin{tabular}{ll}
G Ben Arous & Courant \\
M Berry & Bristol\\
Daniel Fisher& Stanford\\
T Lubensky & Penn\\
M Moore & Manchester \\
E Witten & IAS Princeton
\end{tabular}
We have also added some very first results of the geometric implications for a
random complex landscape of our calculation, something we plan to expend on in
a future full article.
\closing{Sincerely,}
\vspace{1em}
\end{letter}
\end{document}
|
