summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>2021-10-26 12:00:26 +0200
committerJaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>2021-10-26 12:00:26 +0200
commitb4b217a9bb968b3b09ec2b2cdd64dc3377f19721 (patch)
treeaa5fb32d2cad2b6627d02c4c6c48d20b5bc57a7d
parentf45800e28285eea82ee488ead21dd68eba2bb2a1 (diff)
downloadpaper-b4b217a9bb968b3b09ec2b2cdd64dc3377f19721.tar.gz
paper-b4b217a9bb968b3b09ec2b2cdd64dc3377f19721.tar.bz2
paper-b4b217a9bb968b3b09ec2b2cdd64dc3377f19721.zip
Sweep for spelling mistakes.
-rw-r--r--ising_scaling.tex6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/ising_scaling.tex b/ising_scaling.tex
index d867714..b8c4d79 100644
--- a/ising_scaling.tex
+++ b/ising_scaling.tex
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ spatial dimension in two dimensions, while its coefficient is chosen as a
matter of convention, fixing the scale of $u_t$. The form $u_f$ of the free
energy is known as the singular part of the free energy, since it is equivalent
to subtracting an analytic function of the control variables from the free
-energy, breaking it into pieces that scale homogenously and inhomogenously with
+energy, breaking it into pieces that scale homogeneously and inhomogeneously with
renormalization.
Solving these equations for $u_f$ yields
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ For the scale of $u_t$ and $u_h$, we adopt the same convention as used by
the parameters $t$ and $h$ is system-dependent, and their form can be found for
common model systems (the square- and triangular-lattice Ising models) in the
literature \cite{Mangazeev_2010_Scaling, Clement_2019_Respect}. To connect the
-results of thes paper with Mangazeev and Fonseca, one can write $\mathcal
+results of this paper with Mangazeev and Fonseca, one can write $\mathcal
F_0(\eta)=\tilde\Phi(-\eta)=\Phi(-\eta)+(\eta^2/8\pi) \log \eta^2$ and
$\mathcal F_\pm(\xi)=G_{\mathrm{high}/\mathrm{low}}(\xi)$.
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ use of the identity
0=\oint_{\mathcal C}d\vartheta\,\frac{\mathcal F(\vartheta)}{\vartheta^2(\vartheta-\theta)}
\end{equation}
where $\mathcal C$ is the contour in Figure \ref{fig:contour}. The integral is
-zero because there are no singularites enclosed by the contour. The only
+zero because there are no singularities enclosed by the contour. The only
nonvanishing contributions from this contour as the radius of the semicircle is
taken to infinity are along the real line and along the branch cut in the upper
half plane. For the latter contributions, the real parts of the integration up