diff options
author | Jaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com> | 2020-05-27 15:41:55 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com> | 2020-05-27 15:41:55 -0400 |
commit | bbcc32c1e2a7579811e17abac38ba5e4411941ba (patch) | |
tree | 8134a7d40ee3fe0360a6d2ef2f61eacde0b7e854 /main.tex | |
parent | aeacccad3a59ad69dcbd4de3f1d731efcd5a1524 (diff) | |
parent | 594beb4734708b8573e638bf9d5dc53424385ea0 (diff) | |
download | PRB_102_075129-bbcc32c1e2a7579811e17abac38ba5e4411941ba.tar.gz PRB_102_075129-bbcc32c1e2a7579811e17abac38ba5e4411941ba.tar.bz2 PRB_102_075129-bbcc32c1e2a7579811e17abac38ba5e4411941ba.zip |
Merge branch 'master' of https://git.overleaf.com/5cf56f861d72e9071d1a343c
Diffstat (limited to 'main.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | main.tex | 19 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -609,6 +609,25 @@ is characterized by uniform $\Bog$ order. The staggered nematic of \ho\ is similar to the striped superconducting phase found in LBCO and other cuperates.\cite{Berg_2009b} +{\color{blue} +We can also connect our abstract order parameter to a physical picture of multipolar +ordering. +The U-5f electrons in URu$_2$Si$_2$ exhibit a moderate degree of localization [cite], which is +reflected in partial occupancy of many electronic states. Motivated by the results of refs [cite], +we assume that the dominant U state consists of $j = 5/2$ electrons in the U-5f2 configuration, which has +total angular momentum $J = 4$. Within the $J=4$ multiplet, the precise energetic ordering +of the $D_{4h}$ crystal field states still remains a matter of debate [cite]. In a simple +framework of localized $j = 5/2$ electrons in the 5f2 configuration, our phenomenological theory +is consistent with the ground state being the B$_{1g}$ crystal field state with +order parameter +\[ + H = \eta (J_x^2 - J_y^2) +\] +corresponding to hexadecapolar orbital order, +where here $\eta$ is taken to be modulated at $\vec{Q} = (0, 0, 1)$. +The result of non-zero $\eta$ is a nematic distortion of the B1g orbitals, alternating along the c-axis. +} + The coincidence of our theory's orthorhombic high-pressure phase and \urusi's \afm\ is compelling, but our mean field theory does not make any explicit connection with the physics of \afm. Neglecting this physics could be |