summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/monte-carlo.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>2018-10-21 20:09:52 -0400
committerJaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>2018-10-21 20:09:52 -0400
commit82e10672cdb1605e0b6dd601886c9e7a4f3d547e (patch)
tree2fcc5416c57b30eb3c7be6ec8e1b9fc0fa4d9001 /monte-carlo.tex
parent33dc795e1c386463b26d3ed1f3e5110d9faca9eb (diff)
downloadPRE_98_063306-82e10672cdb1605e0b6dd601886c9e7a4f3d547e.tar.gz
PRE_98_063306-82e10672cdb1605e0b6dd601886c9e7a4f3d547e.tar.bz2
PRE_98_063306-82e10672cdb1605e0b6dd601886c9e7a4f3d547e.zip
clarified improved estimators for o(n) models
Diffstat (limited to 'monte-carlo.tex')
-rw-r--r--monte-carlo.tex4
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/monte-carlo.tex b/monte-carlo.tex
index 3d6ed8e..f5ff8e7 100644
--- a/monte-carlo.tex
+++ b/monte-carlo.tex
@@ -425,7 +425,9 @@ are preserved, including correlators with the ghost site
exists, we expect this representation to extend it to finite field, all other
features of the algorithm held constant. For instance, the average cluster
size in the Wolff algorithm is often said to be an estimator for the magnetic
-susceptibility in the Ising, Potts, and $\mathrm O(n)$ models, but really what
+susceptibility in the Ising, Potts, and (with clusters weighted by the
+components of their spins along the reflection direction
+\cite{hasenbusch_improved_1990}) $\mathrm O(n)$ models, but really what
it estimates is the averaged squared magnetization, which corresponds to the
susceptibility when the average magnetization is zero. At finite field the
latter thing is no longer true, but the correspondence between cluster size