summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/monte-carlo.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'monte-carlo.tex')
-rw-r--r--monte-carlo.tex10
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/monte-carlo.tex b/monte-carlo.tex
index d535c3b..8322d6c 100644
--- a/monte-carlo.tex
+++ b/monte-carlo.tex
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
\documentclass[aps,pre,reprint]{revtex4-1}
-\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,latexsym,mathtools,algorithm}
+\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,latexsym,mathtools,algorithm,graphicx}
% uncomment to label only equations that are referenced in the text
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ times and these numeric experiments can be found in section
\ref{sec:performance}.
\begin{figure}
- \include{fig_generator-times}
+ \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig_generator-times.png}
\caption{
The scaled autocorrelation time of the energy $\H$ for the Wolff algorithm
on a $32\times32\times32$ \textsc{xy} model at its critical temperature as a
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ roughly like $h^{-z\nu/\beta\delta}$ and collapse appropriately as a function
of $hL^{\beta\delta/\nu}$.
\begin{figure*}
- \include{fig_correlation-times}
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fig_correlation-times.png}
\caption{
Scaling collapse of autocorrelation times $\tau$ for the energy $\H$
scaled by the average cluster size as a function of external field for
@@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ proportional to their size, or
\]
\begin{figure*}
- \input{fig_cluster-scaling}
+ \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig_cluster-scaling.png}
\caption{Collapses of rescaled average Wolff cluster size $\avg s_{\text{\sc
1c}}L^{-\gamma/\nu}$ as a function of field scaling variable
$hL^{\beta\delta/\nu}$ for a variety of models. Critical exponents
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ two-dimensional melting of argon on a graphite substrate
\cite{zhang_melting_1991}.
\begin{figure}
- \include{fig_harmonic-susceptibilities}
+ \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig_harmonic-susceptibilities.png}
\caption{Susceptibilities as a function of system size for a \twodee O(2)
model at $T=0.7$ and with (top) fourfold symmetric and (bottom) sixfold
symmetric perturbing fields. Different field strengths are shown in