summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>2021-03-18 21:49:13 +0100
committerJaron Kent-Dobias <jaron@kent-dobias.com>2021-03-18 21:49:13 +0100
commit5a903b3dca614142434a51054157e1f6642a63ae (patch)
tree79ee8463b45dbfb3562f6b8c4f6e2ba215cb5543
parent0107fa065ab055dcd724aad1cf87c2146e31ec88 (diff)
downloadPRR_3_023064-5a903b3dca614142434a51054157e1f6642a63ae.tar.gz
PRR_3_023064-5a903b3dca614142434a51054157e1f6642a63ae.tar.bz2
PRR_3_023064-5a903b3dca614142434a51054157e1f6642a63ae.zip
Missing word added.
-rw-r--r--bezout.tex2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/bezout.tex b/bezout.tex
index 4b3bd19..902818c 100644
--- a/bezout.tex
+++ b/bezout.tex
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ One might balk at the constraint $z^Tz=N$---which could appropriately be called
a \emph{hyperbolic} constraint---by comparison with $z^\dagger z=N$. The reasoning
behind the choice is twofold.
-First, we seek draw conclusions from our model that are applicable to generic
+First, we seek to draw conclusions from our model that are applicable to generic
holomorphic functions without any symmetry. Samples of $H_0$ nearly provide
this, save for a single anomaly: the value of the energy and its gradient at
any point $z$ correlate along the $z$ direction, with $\overline{H_0\partial